Skip to content

Answer key

Chapter 16 answers

  1. Solution 16.1

    CC-16-01← Return to Exercise 16.1
    Show the exercise

    Identify which components in the Brown model are italic and which are roman.

    A sound answer

    Italicize the case name only in the model; keep the reporter volume/name, first page, pinpoint, court/year parenthetical, and separating/end punctuation roman. An abbreviation's own italicized period, such as in Id., is a separate case. Apply typography to components rather than the whole string. The underlying identity and source support do not change when the visual treatment is repaired.

    Why it works

    Typeface works at the component level. The italicized case name distinguishes the named authority from its publication information, while roman reporter and date fields retain their ordinary treatment. The citation's comma separates fields rather than belonging to the italicized name. An abbreviation's internal period is a different punctuation role, which explains why Id. is handled differently.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not italicize the entire citation to make it look uniform. That erases the intended distinction between the case name and its identifying publication fields.

    Check your work

    Select each component separately in the document. Confirm that only the case name carries the model's italics and that the comma outside it remains roman.

  2. Solution 16.2

    CC-16-02← Return to Exercise 16.2
    Show the exercise

    Repair “§12(b)” and explain the symbol's spacing and subsection punctuation.

    A sound answer

    § 12(b). Leave a space between the section symbol and number, while the subsection parentheses remain attached to the section number. Do not convert the locator to a page or introduce at. The precise nested syntax directs the reader to one provision. If several sections are cited, use the appropriate plural marker and actual range or list.

    Why it works

    The symbol introduces a section, while the attached parentheses descend into its numbered structure. Spacing after the symbol improves separation; adding a space between 12 and (b) would break the compact nested address. The repair preserves the locator's role rather than converting it into a page reference or treating (b) as a separate source.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not write § 12 (b) or §12(b). The first separates a subdivision from its section; the second omits the conventional space after the symbol.

    Check your work

    Read the locator as one address: section 12, subsection b. Inspect the exported text to ensure the space and attached parentheses survived.

  3. Solution 16.3

    CC-16-03← Return to Exercise 16.3
    Show the exercise

    Explain why a postal state abbreviation is not automatically a suitable citation abbreviation.

    A sound answer

    Postal abbreviations serve mailing addresses; legal citation tables use a different category-specific system. Some spellings coincide and others differ. Look up the state in the relevant geographical table and apply the source/local rule. A familiar two-letter postal code should not be inserted merely because it is shorter. Preserve an exact quoted source name unless an alteration is appropriately disclosed.

    Why it works

    Abbreviations belong to a purpose and source category. Mailing systems use postal codes, while legal citation systems may use longer geographical forms. A state name in a formal source title or quotation can require still another treatment. The correct lookup therefore begins by asking where the word appears and which instruction governs that use.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not globally replace state names with two-letter postal codes. That can alter prose, quotations, and legal citations that each need different forms.

    Check your work

    Identify the source type and receiving convention before looking up the state. Verify the proposed form against that specific table or instruction.

  4. Solution 16.4

    CC-16-04← Return to Exercise 16.4
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. A book citation has its author italicized and its title roman. Describe the typography repair under the practitioner baseline.

    A sound answer

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Make the author's full name roman and the book title italicized under this practitioner pattern. Keep the pinpoint and edition/year parenthetical in their appropriate roman treatment. If a receiving academic format requires another system, follow that actual instruction separately. Do not mistake italicizing every element for consistency; the categories must remain visually distinguishable.

    Why it works

    The author and title identify different components of a book citation. Practitioner typography keeps the author in roman type and emphasizes the title with italics. A whole-string style toggle cannot make that distinction. The repair should also preserve page, edition, and year as separate fields, because their identity does not change when typeface is corrected.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not italicize the author simply because the name comes first. Position in the string is not the rule; the component's function determines its treatment.

    Check your work

    Compare the model book citation component by component: author roman, title italic, pinpoint and edition/year roman.

  5. Solution 16.5

    CC-16-05← Return to Exercise 16.5
    Show the exercise

    Explain the difference between citation ordinals 2d/3d and a Restatement's spelled ordinal.

    A sound answer

    Citation ordinals commonly use 2d and 3d in the relevant fields, without superscript suffixes. A Restatement title spells its ordinal, such as (Second). Reporter series preserve their actual identifying spelling. The choice depends on source category rather than a global preference for all ordinals. Applying 2d to a Restatement title would violate the taught title pattern.

    Why it works

    Ordinals are not governed by one global find-and-replace rule. A court or edition field may use 2d or 3d, while a Restatement's ordinal forms part of its spelled title. Reporter-series identifiers must match the actual reporter. The editor must classify the field before changing the suffix or deciding whether an ordinal is abbreviated at all.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not replace (Second) with (2d) in a Restatement title or superscript every suffix. A visually consistent result can still misidentify the source.

    Check your work

    For each ordinal, name its role: title, edition, court, or reporter series. Apply only the convention governing that role.

  6. Solution 16.6

    CC-16-06← Return to Exercise 16.6
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. A brief refers once to its receiving court and once generically to courts nationwide. Explain the contextual capitalization decision.

    A sound answer

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Use Court when referring to the receiving court under the taught contextual rule, and courts for the generic nationwide category. The capitalization identifies a specific contextual referent rather than asserting greater legal force. Other supplied conventions can apply to the Supreme Court or complete formal names. Inspect each occurrence rather than globally capitalizing every court reference.

    Why it works

    The taught capitalization rule uses context to distinguish a particular receiving court from a generic category. It does not capitalize a noun merely because legal writing seems formal. The same document can therefore contain Court for its addressee and courts for a nationwide discussion. Exact quotations and full formal names require their own source-sensitive checks.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not use a global lowercase operation either. It could erase the required contextual treatment of the receiving Court while fixing generic references.

    Check your work

    For each occurrence, identify its referent before changing capitalization. A generic plural and the actual receiving court should not be treated identically.

  7. Solution 16.7

    CC-16-07← Return to Exercise 16.7
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. The receiving instruction permits, but does not require, compressed reporter abbreviations for word limits. Your memorandum uses ordinary spacing throughout. A reviewer marks every space in F. Supp. 3d as an error. Explain whether that correction is required and what consistency decision remains.

    A sound answer

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    The correction is not required. The receiving instruction permits compression, while the memorandum consistently uses ordinary spacing. Retain F. Supp. 3d unless the writer chooses the permitted compact form for a concrete reason, such as a word limit. If changing that choice, apply the permitted treatment consistently to the relevant citation fields.

    Why it works

    An optional form creates a choice; it does not make the other permitted form erroneous. The reviewer has mistaken permission to compress for a command to remove spaces. A document-wide decision can promote consistent reading, but its scope should follow the receiving instruction rather than an indiscriminate removal of every space in the text.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not change quoted source text, titles, or unrelated abbreviations merely because one compression option is available. Also do not claim that ordinary spacing is mandatory in every court.

    Check your work

    Read the instruction's operative words—permits, not requires—then compare the memorandum's citations with the selected spacing policy. Equivalent citations should follow the same choice.

  8. Solution 16.8

    CC-16-08← Return to Exercise 16.8
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. A global replacement abbreviates Corporation inside a quotation without disclosure. What must the editor restore or disclose?

    A sound answer

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Restore the source's quoted Corporation or disclose an actually permissible alteration under the applicable quotation convention. A global replacement does not itself justify changing exact words. Check whether the abbreviation changes meaning or identification and compare the entire quotation again. Typography and abbreviation cleanup must not silently create a quotation the source never supplied.

    Why it works

    A quotation represents source wording. Case-name abbreviation rules do not automatically authorize editing that wording. The repair restores Corporation and prompts a comparison of the whole quotation, because a global replacement may have changed other terms too. If an alteration is needed and permitted, disclose it under the quotation convention rather than letting a cleanup operation hide it.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not assume a shorter form is harmless because readers understand it. Accurate quotation requires an actual basis for alteration, not merely a guess that meaning survived.

    Check your work

    Compare the quoted sentence word for word with the source, including capitalization and punctuation, before accepting the typography pass.

  9. Solution 16.9

    CC-16-09← Return to Exercise 16.9
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. A draft contains “§12 (b)” in a statutory locator and the exact quotation “The Corporation shall deliver the BLUE copy.” A global edit proposes “§ 12(b)” and replaces every “Corporation” with “Corp.” The house uses ordinary citation spacing and preserves exact quotation wording. Accept or reject each proposed change, explain why, and design one search that helps review without automatically changing quotations.

    A sound answer

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Accept § 12(b) for the locator: it restores the space after § and keeps the subdivision attached. Reject the automatic replacement inside the exact quotation; preserve “The Corporation shall deliver the BLUE copy.” Search for Corporation as a whole word and inspect every result's context before changing it. The same word can appear in prose, a case name, a title, or an exact quotation, with different treatment.

    Why it works

    The two search hits perform different jobs. The section locator needs a conventional spacing correction that preserves its address. The quoted sentence needs fidelity to the supplied wording. A whole-word search can locate Corporation for review, but the reviewer must classify each hit before acting. This prevents a useful search from becoming an uncontrolled rewriting rule.

    A tempting mistake

    Do not accept all replacements because one result was correct. A batch can contain both genuine locator errors and exact source language that should remain unchanged.

    Check your work

    After editing, verify § 12(b) and compare the quotation character by character with the packet. The word Corporation must still appear there.

Previous
Chapter 15 answers