Skip to content

Start here

Quick guide

The model citation and compact reference from every chapter on one page. Each entry links to the full explanation, worked decisions and exercises. Models carrying the fiction badge are training examples, never authority.

Part I — Understanding Citations

01Your First Case Citation

Model

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954).

A conventional reported-case full citation supplies the name, volume, reporter, first page, pinpoint when supporting a particular passage, and necessary court/year information. A first page identifies; a pinpoint locates. The deciding court may be omitted only when the citation otherwise identifies it unambiguously. The retrieval date belongs in your research record, not in place of the decision year. A source match, a passage check, and a current-validity investigation are different checks.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

02Sources and Citation Placement

Identify the source type, then the claim type. Place the citation after the assertion it supports. Use a citation sentence for a complete preceding assertion, a citation clause for a portion of a sentence, and an embedded reference when naming the authority advances the prose. Preserve the distinction between a rule, an allegation, evidence, and an inference. Check the receiving document's directions before adopting a footnote system.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

03Signals and Explanatory Parentheticals

Model

Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 78 (1938) (stating that there is no federal general common law).

Relationship Usual signal What to verify
Direct statement or quotation No signal The source says the proposition
Clear inferential support See The inferential step follows
Representative direct support E.g., The authority is an example of a supporting set
Additional support See also Earlier support has been supplied
Analogy Cf. Similarity and differences are explained
Comparison Compare ... with ... The relationship supports the conclusion
Direct contradiction Contra The opposition is direct
Inferential opposition But see The adverse connection is explained
Contrary analogy But cf. The adverse analogy is explained
Background See generally The material is used as background

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

04Pinpoints Quotations and Alterations

Model

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986) (explaining when a dispute about a material fact is genuine).

Use the source's actual coordinates. Separate identification from location. Verify quotations against the source, then assess the effect of every change. Use blocks at fifty words under the taught baseline. Treat readability modifications as bounded conventions subject to the receiving document's requirements.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

Part II — Cases and Court Materials

05Building Complete Case Citations

Model

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986).

Identify opinion → collect name, volume, reporter, first page, court, year → select pinpoint → apply name and court exceptions → add necessary opinion/history information → verify support. Reporter series and court level are independent checks. Keep a source card even when your final citation is short.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

06Short Forms Without Confusion

Model

Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954).

Before shortening, ask: Has this source been fully identified? Is the proposed short form permitted for this source type? Can this reader locate it unambiguously? Does the pinpoint now support the sentence? For id., add: What is the immediately preceding cited authority after all edits?

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

09Litigation Documents and the Record

ModelFictional training example — not legal authority.

Source packet: Declaration of Lina Vale, signed May 2, 2025, paragraph 6, filed as docket entry 18 in the current training case. Paragraph 6 states: “I delivered the sealed envelope to the intake desk at 9:10 a.m.”

Document identity → version/date → parent or docket identifier → required page/paragraph/line locator → accurate attribution → receiving-court check. A fact sentence and its record citation must agree about who said what and where.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

Part III — Legislative and Administrative Sources

12Regulations and Administrative Materials

ModelFictional training example — not legal authority.

Packet: fictional Harbor Administrative Code, title 4, section 12.3(b), edition 2025; text requires a signed application. Training citation: Harbor Admin. Code tit. 4, § 12.3(b) (2025).

Codified text: title/code/section/version. Rulemaking publication: title or subject, volume/publication/page/date/status. Agency decision: agency-specific identifying fields and pinpoint. Guidance: its actual title/date/URL and attributed role.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

13Legislative History and Specialized Materials

ModelFictional training example — not legal authority.

Supplied bill packet: Harbor Notice Bill, H.R. 9000, 119th Congress, introduced in 2025, section 3(b). The entire bill and its number are invented for training.

Bill: chamber/number + Congress/session + provision + date/version. Report: chamber/report number + Congress + pinpoint + year/status. Hearing: title/committee/body + page + date + speaker where needed. Tax: classify the instrument before selecting its specialized locator.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

Part IV — Secondary and Digital Sources

Part V — Using the System

18Cumulative Practice and Capstone

ModelFictional training example — not legal authority.

Vale v. Harbor Recs. Off., 12 Fiction Rep. 100, 104 (Harbor 2024).

Use the complete packet. Correct evidence and meaning first. Correct source fields and locators next. Recheck short forms, local instruction, and final paragraph flow. Record unresolved issues expressly.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

Part VI — Academic and Specialized Sources

20Foreign and Comparative Sources

Model

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [82].

Identify jurisdiction, institution, source type, identifier, locator, version, and language. Start with official material. Preserve distinctive local identifiers. Adapt display only after the metadata is verified. Explain the source's role in the argument and the limits of the comparison.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

21International and Supranational Sources

Model

U.N. Charter art. 2, ¶ 4.

Identify institution, source type, official identifier, procedural stage, date, language, and pinpoint. Separate the instrument from status information and commentary. Read the actual passage. Preserve revisions and explain the source's legal role before selecting citation punctuation.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)

22Tribal and Indigenous Legal Sources

Model

Nav. R. Civ. P. 1.

Identify the sovereign, issuing institution, instrument, version, and locator. Check local citation instructions. Preserve official names. Distinguish legal text, judicial interpretation, evidence, and commentary. Keep archival custody separate from authorship and explain any access or research limits specifically.

Read the chapter →Practice (9)