Skip to content

PropertyEstates and future interests

Mahrenholz v. County Board of School Trustees of Lawrence County

Illinois Appellate Court · Decided January 29, 1981 · Core case

Full citation

Mahrenholz v. Cnty. Bd. of Sch. Trs., 417 N.E.2d 138 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981).

Quote pages are pages of 93 Ill. App. 3d 366, the official report, so quotes and pinpoints cite it; for 417 N.E.2d 138, find the page in that reporter.

VerifiedQuotes, pinpoints and citation checked word for word against the opinion; facts checked against the opinion before publication. October 20, 2026.

Herbert L. Mahrenholz et al.

claimants to the reverterplaintiffs-appellants

County Board of School Trustees of Lawrence County et al.

school boarddefendants-appellees

The parties: Herbert L. Mahrenholz et al. v. County Board of School Trustees of Lawrence County et al..

Brief

Facts

According to the pleadings, in 1941 W. E. and Jennie Hutton gave a warranty deed to the trustees of School District No. 1, the predecessors of the defendants. The deed said "this land to be used for school purpose only; otherwise to revert to Grantors herein". W. E. Hutton died intestate (without a will) in 1951, and Jennie Hutton died intestate in 1969. Their only legal heir was their son, Harry E. Hutton. The land became the site of the Hutton School. Classes were held there until May 30, 1973. After that date, children were transported to classes at other facilities, and the district used the property only for storage. In 1959, Earl and Madeline Jacqmain deeded over 390 acres to the plaintiffs, including the 40-acre tract from which the school grounds were taken. That deed excepted the school grounds but purported to convey the reversionary interest. On May 7, 1977, Harry Hutton conveyed all his interest in the school land to the plaintiffs. On September 6, 1977, he signed a disclaimer and release of any such interest in favor of the school board. The plaintiffs claimed title to the school property through the Jacqmains and through Harry Hutton.

Issues

  1. Did the 1941 deed to the school trustees create a fee simple determinable followed by a possibility of reverter, or a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent followed by a right of entry for condition broken?
  2. Could the plaintiffs have acquired any interest in the school property from the Jacqmains in 1959, or from Harry Hutton in 1977?

Holding

The 1941 deed, which gave land "to be used for school purpose only; otherwise to revert" to the grantors, created a fee simple determinable followed by a possibility of reverter. The trial court therefore erred in dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint on the ground that Harry Hutton held only a right of entry. The court remanded without deciding whether the plaintiffs in fact took Harry Hutton's interest.

The rest of this brief is for subscribers

Every plan includes the procedural history, the rule and the reasoning, the IRAC and CREAC versions, every key quote with its pinpoint, the citation box with parallel citations and short forms and the exam angle.

Learn the citation form

Short video lessons on the rules behind this brief’s citations, each with two pause-and-practice exercises.

The Citation Code · citationcode.com/cases/mahrenholz-v-county-board-of-school-trustees