Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 26, 2015 · Core case
Full citation
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
VerifiedQuotes, pinpoints and citation checked word for word against the opinion; facts checked against the opinion before publication. October 16, 2026.
Obergefell
same-sex couplespetitioners
Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health
state health directorrespondent
Brief
Facts
Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The petitioners were 14 same-sex couples and two men whose same-sex partners had died. The respondents were the state officials responsible for enforcing those laws. James Obergefell and John Arthur lived in Ohio. In 2011 Arthur was diagnosed with ALS, a progressive disease with no known cure. The two traveled to Maryland, where same-sex marriage was legal, and married inside a medical transport plane on the tarmac in Baltimore. Arthur died three months later. Ohio law did not allow Obergefell to be listed as the surviving spouse on Arthur's death certificate. April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse, both nurses, were raising three children in Michigan. Michigan allowed only opposite-sex married couples or single people to adopt, so each child could have only one of the women as a legal parent. Ijpe DeKoe, an Army Reserve sergeant, married Thomas Kostura in New York before DeKoe deployed to Afghanistan. When they settled in Tennessee, their lawful marriage was not recognized there. The petitioners claimed the respondents violated the Fourteenth Amendment by denying them the right to marry, or by refusing full recognition to marriages lawfully performed in another State.
Issues
- Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?
- Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a State to recognize a same-sex marriage that was lawfully licensed and performed in another State?
Holding
Same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States. The challenged laws are invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage on the same terms as opposite-sex couples, and no State may refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another State because of its same-sex character.
The rest of this brief is for subscribers
Subscribers also get the procedural history, the rule and the reasoning, the IRAC and CREAC versions, every key quote with its pinpoint, the citation box with parallel citations and short forms, and the exam angle. Subscriptions open after the Kindle launch period.
IRAC
The rest of this brief is for subscribers
Subscribers also get the procedural history, the rule and the reasoning, the IRAC and CREAC versions, every key quote with its pinpoint, the citation box with parallel citations and short forms, and the exam angle. Subscriptions open after the Kindle launch period.
CREAC
The rest of this brief is for subscribers
Subscribers also get the procedural history, the rule and the reasoning, the IRAC and CREAC versions, every key quote with its pinpoint, the citation box with parallel citations and short forms, and the exam angle. Subscriptions open after the Kindle launch period.
The Citation Code · citationcode.com/cases/obergefell-v-hodges