Skip to content

How citations work

How to cite subsequent history (aff’d, rev’d, cert. denied)

Subsequent history tells the reader what a higher court later did with the decision you cite. Add it after the citation with an italic phrase, such as “aff’d,” “rev’d,” or “cert. denied,” followed by the later decision’s citation.

The book’s Table F lists the history phrases and their forms.

12 real examples

Each citation is printed as the book prints it, from an authority the book checked against its source.

  1. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842–43 (1984), overruled by Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 412 (2024).

    Case name
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.
    Volume, reporter and first page
    467 U.S. 837
    Pinpoint
    842–43
    Year
    (1984)

    The authorities

  2. Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 45 F.4th 359 (D.C. Cir. 2022), vacated, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).

    Case name
    Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo
    Volume, reporter and first page
    45 F.4th 359
    Court and date
    (D.C. Cir. 2022)

    The authorities

  3. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), overruled by Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).

    Case name
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.
    Volume, reporter and first page
    467 U.S. 837
    Year
    (1984)

    The authorities

    Where the book teaches this

  4. Thaler v. Perlmutter, 687 F. Supp. 3d 140 (D.D.C. 2023), aff’d, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025), cert. denied, No. 25-449 (U.S. Mar. 2, 2026)

    Case name
    Thaler v. Perlmutter
    Volume, reporter and first page
    687 F. Supp. 3d 140
    Court and date
    (D.D.C. 2023)
    Docket number
    No. 25-449

    The authorities

    Where the book teaches this

  5. Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc., 954 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff’d, 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015).

    Case name
    Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc.
    Volume, reporter and first page
    954 F. Supp. 2d 282
    Court and date
    (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

    The authorities

  6. In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litig., 907 A.2d 693 (Del. Ch. 2005), aff’d, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006).

    Case name
    In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litig.
    Volume, reporter and first page
    907 A.2d 693
    Court and date
    (Del. Ch. 2005)

    The authorities

Where the book teaches this

The full rule, its exceptions and the reasons for it are in these sections.